Coalesce Research Group welcomes you to the "Webinar on Cannabis, Hemp and its Research " with ongoing theme: "Recent advances and Innovations in Cannabis and Hemp" which has been schedule during April 29-30, 2021. Cannabis,Hemp and its Research 2021 expects to assemble the researchers, chief examiners, specialists and analysts working under scholarly community and medicinal services industry, business delegates, scientists and understudies over the globe to give a worldwide gathering to the dispersal of unique research comes about, new thoughts, and useful improvement encounters. We trust that you will get a handle on this scholastic event to renew the persevering associations and glimmer with new companions far and wide. This specific gathering conduct introduction circulates data, conducts gatherings with present and potential researchers, make a sprinkle with new medication improvements, and get name acknowledgment at this 2-day occasion. World's prominent speakers, the latest restorative and demonstrative procedures, advancements, and the novel advances and remedial measures for irresistible sicknesses anticipation and control are signs of this meeting.
Advantages of Webinar
Who can take part?
Abstract Peer-review Process/Guidelines:
The Reviewing Committee of Conference ensures high-quality peer review process for all abstracts submitted to ensure adherence to the conference scope and abstracts which have passed this initial screening are then assigned to the session chair / review committee for evaluation.
The decision of abstract acceptance will be decided by a panel of experts emphasizing whether the findings and / or conclusions are novel and make useful contributions to the field.
The committee operates a single / double-blind peer review process for all the abstracts submitted, where both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous.
Once the reviews have been received, the review committee decides to accept or reject a manuscript, or to request revisions from the author in response to the reviewers’ comments. If the decision tends to be minor revision or major revision, authors will be given 14 days to resubmit the revised abstract.
Criteria to be considered for Scoring:
The abstract will be reviewed according to the following criteria:
Originality of concept/approach and level of innovativeness
Significance/impact/relevance to conference theme
Quality of research design/theoretical argument
Conclusions and interpretations of results
Presentation style: Coherence and clarity of structure