Pediatrics, Neonatology & Perinatology

Coalesce Research Group cordially invite pediatricians and Neonatologists from all over the globe  to attend the “European Congress on Pediatrics, Neonatology & Perinatology” (Hybrid event) which is going to be held during September 12-14, 2022 . The main theme of the conference is "Breakthrough to the excellence in the field of Neonatology and Pediatrics".

The aim of the meeting is to present the latest research achievements in the fields of Pediatrics, Neonatology & Perinatology and Child Health in connection with health, Medicine and the environment. It will be a meeting with international participation and with a selection of high-quality lectures, also facilitate direct contact and exchange of knowledge among researchers from academic institutions, Hospitals and industry

Targeted Audience

Neonatologists
Perinatologists
Neonatal nurses
Pediatricians
Pediatric surgeons,
Pediatric Cardiologists
Researchers
Healthcare professionals
Industrialists
Students
Guidelines For Speakers

1. Keep the number of slides in your Presentation to a minimum and follow the assigned slots.
2. Please stop when signaled to do so by the Chair.
3. Personal laptops should not be used unless in any unavoidable conditions.
4. The Videos will not be recorded.
5. Question Sessions, thanks and acknowledgement of the speakers will take place during the session or after completion of the session, so please stay until the end of the session.

Guidelines For Poster

1. Each poster should be approximately 1x1 M in Size The title, contents, text and the author’s information should be clearly visible even from 1-2 feet.
2. Present numerical data in the form of graphs, rather than tables.
3. If data must be presented in table-form, keep it Simple to be easily understandable.
4. Visuals should be simple, clear and bold. Avoid acronyms and mathematical notations as much as possible.
5. Posters with 800-1000 words or less are perfect.
6. Avoid submitting compactly packed, highly worded- count posters.
7. Categorize your poster into subdivisions, e.g., Introduction, Methods, Results; Discussion, Conclusions, and Literature Cited.
8. Use bright colors to enhance the better visibility Besides your project, you can also include future research plans or questions.

Opportunities for Conference Attendees

For Researchers & Faculty

1. Speaker Presentations
2. Poster Display
3. Symposium hosting
4. Workshop organizing

For Universities, Associations & Societies

1. Association Partnering
2. Collaboration proposals
3. Academic Partnering
4. Group Participation

For Students & Research Scholars

1. Poster Presentation Competition (Best Poster Award for the winner)
2. Young Researcher Forum (Award to the best presenter)
3. Student Attendee
4. Group Registrations

For Business Speakers

1. Speaker Presentations
2. Symposium hosting
3. Book Launch event
4. Networking opportunities
5. Audience participation

For Companies

1. Exhibitor and Vendor Booths
2. Sponsorships opportunities
3. Product launch
4. Workshop organizing
5. Scientific Partnering
6. Marketing and Networking with clients

Abstract Peer-review Process/Guidelines

1. The Reviewing Committee of Conference ensures high-quality peer review process for all abstracts submitted.
2. The decision of abstract acceptance will be judged by a panel of experts emphasizing whether the findings and / or conclusions are novel and make useful contributions to the field.
3. The committee operates a single / double-blind peer review process for all the abstracts submitted, where both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous.

The following are the steps that each abstract of Conference undergoes during the process of peer review

1. All submitted abstracts are reviewed by internal editorial team to ensure adherence to the conference scope and abstracts which have passed this initial screening are then assigned to the session chair / review committee for evaluation.
2. Once the reviews have been received, the review committee decides to accept or reject a manuscript, or to request revisions from the author in response to the reviewers’ comments. If the decision tends to be minor revision or major revision, authors will be given 14 days to resubmit the revised abstract.

Criteria to be considered for Scoring

The abstract should be reviewed according to the following criteria:

1. Originality of concept/approach and level of innovativeness
2. Significance/impact/relevance to conference theme
3. Quality of research design/theoretical argument
4. Conclusions and interpretations of results
5. Presentation style: Coherence and clarity of structure