Coalesce Research Group welcomes you all to attend “3rd Online International Conference on Aquaculture and Fisheries” scheduled from November 15-16, 2021 with the theme “Current Research and Innovations in Aquaculture and Fisheries”.
Who can attend?
Aquaculture & Fisheries Departments
Aquaculture Associations & Societies
Business Entrepreneurs and related individuals
Why to Join?
Meet Consultants & Influencers Face to Face
Learning during a new Platform
Have Energy of similar people
Investment on yourself & finally have a good time
Why Aquaculture and Fisheries: The Aquaculture and Fisheries sector isn't while not challenges, however, together with the requirement to scale back the proportion of fish stocks fished on the far side biological property, presently 33.1% to make sure that biosecurity and disease challenges are tackled with success and to take care of complete and correct national statistics in support of policy development and implementation. These and different challenges engendered blue growth initiative, integrated and multispectral approach to the management of aquatic resources geared towards maximizing the system merchandise and services obtained from the utilization of oceans, midland waters and wetlands, whereas conjointly providing social and economic edges.
Guidelines For Speakers
Keep the number of slides in your Presentation to a minimum and follow the assigned slots.
Please stop when signaled to do so by the Chair.
Personal laptops should not be used unless in any unavoidable conditions.
The Videos will not be recorded.
Question Sessions, thanks and acknowledgement of the speakers will take place during the session or after completion of the session, so please stay until the end of the session.
Guidelines For Poster
Each poster should be approximately 1x1 M in Size The title, contents, text and the author’s information should be clearly visible even from 1-2 feet.
Present numerical data in the form of graphs, rather than tables.
If data must be presented in table-form, keep it Simple to be easily understandable.
Visuals should be simple, clear and bold. Avoid acronyms and mathematical notations as much as possible.
Posters with 800-1000 words or less are perfect.
Avoid submitting compactly packed, highly worded- count posters.
Categorize your poster into subdivisions, e.g., Introduction, Methods, Results; Discussion, Conclusions, and Literature Cited.
Use bright colors to enhance the better visibility Besides your project, you can also include future research plans or questions.
Opportunities for Conference Attendees
For Researchers & Faculty
For Universities, Associations & Societies
For Students & Research Scholars
Poster Presentation Competition (Winner will get Best Poster Award)
Young Researcher Forum (Award to the best presenter)
For Business Speakers
Book Launch event
Exhibitor and Vendor Booths
Marketing and Networking with clients
Abstract Peer-review Process/Guidelines
The Reviewing Committee of Conference ensures high-quality peer review process for all abstracts submitted.
The decision of abstract acceptance will be judged by a panel of experts emphasizing whether the findings and / or conclusions are novel and make useful contributions to the field.
The committee operates a single / double-blind peer review process for all the abstracts submitted, where both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous.
The following are the steps that each abstract of Conference undergoes during the process of peer review
All submitted abstracts are reviewed by internal editorial team to ensure adherence to the conference scope and abstracts which have passed this initial screening are then assigned to the session chair / review committee for evaluation.
Once the reviews have been received, the review committee decides to accept or reject a manuscript, or to request revisions from the author in response to the reviewers’ comments. If the decision tends to be minor revision or major revision, authors will be given 14 days to resubmit the revised abstract.
Criteria to be considered for Scoring
The abstract should be reviewed according to the following criteria:
Originality of concept/approach and level of innovativeness
Significance/impact/relevance to conference theme
Quality of research design/theoretical argument
Conclusions and interpretations of results
Presentation style: Coherence and clarity of structure