3rd Webinar on Catalysis, Chemical Engineering & Technology

We are pleased to intimate you about our upcoming event "3^rd Webinar on Catalysis, Chemical Engineering and Technology" during June 24-25, 2021. We will be really glad if you could accept our Invitation to participate as a Speaker at our event. CATCHEM 2021 will be a platform of interactions for experts around the world and aims to accelerate scientific discoveries.

The theme of the conference is “Emerging Technologies and Scientific Advancements in Catalysis & Chemical Engineering” covering a wide extent to serve as virtual online platform for the speakers to showcase their highly insightful research work, knowledge from the field of Catalytic Materials & Mechanisms, Chemical Engineering, Catalysis in Material Sciences and Nanotechnology and Polymer Chemistry to the audience and participants. In this peak time of struggle our aim is to bring global scientists/researchers and doctors to one platform to share updated information, Innovation and compliance to regulatory guidelines are the most critical aspects towards Catalytic Materials & Mechanisms, Chemical Engineering, Catalysis in Material Sciences and Nanotechnology and Polymer Engineering, Science and Technology.

Advantages of CATCHEM 2021:

• Offers interactive opportunities to understand target audience
• Reach the target the group directly live and exchange the views of each other
• Cost effective by avoiding travel and accommodation booking
• Opportunities to connect with the hosts and fellow attendees
• Wider reach across the world
• Opportunity to publish your Abstract in any of our esteemed Journals & in the Conference Proceedings Book
• Exchanging business contacts for further networking and business opportunities

Targeted Audience:

• Catalysis Professionals
• Chemical Engineerers
• Researchers and Innovators
• Academic Professors
• Directors and Deans
• Industrial Delegates
• Laboratoties- Academic Faculty and Student
• Associations, Societies and Professional Bodies Industries
• Non – Governmental Organizations

Guidelines For Speakers

• Keep the number of slides in your Presentation to a minimum and follow the assigned slots.
• Please stop when signaled to do so by the Chair.
• Personal laptops should not be used unless in any unavoidable conditions.
• The Videos will not be recorded.
• Question Sessions, thanks and acknowledgement of the speakers will take place during the session or after completion of the session, so please stay until the end of the session.

Guidelines For Poster

• Each poster should be approximately 1x1 M in Size The title, contents, text and the author’s information should be clearly visible even from 1-2 feet.
• Present numerical data in the form of graphs, rather than tables.
• If data must be presented in table-form, keep it Simple to be easily understandable.
• Visuals should be simple, clear and bold. Avoid acronyms and mathematical notations as much as possible.
• Posters with 800-1000 words or less are perfect.
• Avoid submitting compactly packed, highly worded- count posters.
• Categorize your poster into subdivisions, e.g., Introduction, Methods, Results; Discussion, Conclusions, and Literature Cited.
• Use bright colors to enhance the better visibility Besides your project, you can also include future research plans or questions.

Abstract Peer-review Process/Guidelines:

The Reviewing Committee of Conference ensures high-quality peer review process for all abstracts submitted to ensure adherence to the conference scope and abstracts which have passed this initial screening are then assigned to the session chair / review committee for evaluation.

The decision of abstract acceptance will be decided by a panel of experts emphasizing whether the findings and / or conclusions are novel and make useful contributions to the field.

The committee operates a single / double-blind peer review process for all the abstracts submitted, where both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous.

Once the reviews have been received, the review committee decides to accept or reject a manuscript, or to request revisions from the author in response to the reviewers’ comments. If the decision tends to be minor revision or major revision, authors will be given 14 days to resubmit the revised abstract.

Criteria to be considered for Scoring:

The abstract will be reviewed according to the following criteria:

• Originality of concept/approach and level of innovativeness
• Significance/impact/relevance to conference theme
• Quality of research design/theoretical argument
• Conclusions and interpretations of results
• Presentation style: Coherence and clarity of structure