Important Dates

  • Abstract Submission deadline
    September 5, 2022
  • Early Bird Registration:
    April 5, 2022
  • First call Registration:
    August 15, 2022
  • Final call Registration
    September 12, 2022

ECPN 2022

Coalesce Research Group cordially invite pediatricians and Neonatologists from all over the globe to attend the “European Congress on Pediatrics, Neonatology & Perinatology” (Hybrid event) which is going to be held during September 12-14, 2022 . The main theme of the conference is "Breakthrough to the excellence in the field of Neonatology and Pediatrics".

The aim of the meeting is to present the latest research achievements in the fields of Pediatrics, Neonatology & Perinatology and Child Health in connection with health, Medicine and the environment. It will be a meeting with international participation and with a selection of high-quality lectures, also facilitate direct contact and exchange of knowledge among researchers from academic institutions, Hospitals and industry

Targeted Audience



Neonatal nurses


Pediatric surgeons

Pediatric Cardiologists


Healthcare professionals



Guidelines For Speakers

Keep the number of slides in your Presentation to a minimum and follow the assigned slots.

Please stop when signaled to do so by the Chair.

Personal laptops should not be used unless in any unavoidable conditions.

The Videos will not be recorded. Question Sessions, thanks and acknowledgement of the speakers will take place during the session or after completion of the session, so please stay until the end of the session.

Guidelines For Poster

Each poster should be approximately 1x1 M in Size.

The title, contents, text and the author’s information should be clearly visible even from 1-2 feet.

Present numerical data in the form of graphs, rather than tables.

If data must be presented in table-form, keep it Simple to be easily understandable.

Visuals should be simple, clear and bold. Avoid acronyms and mathematical notations as much as possible.

Posters with 800-1000 words or less are perfect.

Avoid submitting compactly packed, highly worded- count posters.

Categorize your poster into subdivisions, e.g., Introduction, Methods, Results; Discussion, Conclusions, and Literature Cited.

Use bright colors to enhance the better visibility Besides your project, you can also include future research plans or questions.

Opportunities for Conference Attendees

For Researchers & Faculty

Speaker Presentations

Poster Display

Symposium hosting

Workshop organizing

For Universities, Associations & Societies

Association Partnering

Collaboration proposals

Academic Partnering

Group Participation

For Students & Research Scholars

Poster Presentation Competition (Best Poster Award for the winner)

Young Researcher Forum (Award to the best presenter)

Student Attendee

Group Registrations

For Business Speakers

Speaker Presentations

Symposium hosting

Book Launch event

Networking opportunities

Audience participation

For Companies

Exhibitor and Vendor Booths

Sponsorships opportunities

Product launch

Workshop organizing

Scientific Partnering

Marketing and Networking with clients

Abstract Peer-review Process/Guidelines

The Reviewing Committee of Conference ensures high-quality peer review process for all abstracts submitted.

The decision of abstract acceptance will be judged by a panel of experts emphasizing whether the findings and / or conclusions are novel and make useful contributions to the field.

The committee operates a single / double-blind peer review process for all the abstracts submitted, where both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous.

The following are the steps that each abstract of Conference undergoes during the process of peer review

All submitted abstracts are reviewed by internal editorial team to ensure adherence to the conference scope and abstracts which have passed this initial screening are then assigned to the session chair / review committee for evaluation.

Once the reviews have been received, the review committee decides to accept or reject a manuscript, or to request revisions from the author in response to the reviewers’ comments. If the decision tends to be minor revision or major revision, authors will be given 14 days to resubmit the revised abstract.

Criteria to be considered for Scoring

The abstract should be reviewed according to the following criteria:

Originality of concept/approach and level of innovativeness

Significance/impact/relevance to conference theme

Quality of research design/theoretical argument

Conclusions and interpretations of results

Presentation style: Coherence and clarity of structure


Organizing Committee

Keynote Speakers

Renowned Speakers

Media Partners/Collaboration

Past Conference Gallery